EASEPRESS 3.3
|
EASEPRESS Release, Minneapolis July 27, 2000 Audrey Kishline: Drunk Driver and Former MM’er On March 25th, 2000, the founder of the self help organization Moderation Management got behind the wheel of her pick-up truck after having drank enough alcohol to register a blood alcohol content level of .26. That is .18 beyond the legal limit for driving and .21 beyond Moderation Management’s (MM) suggested moderation level for women. Audrey Kishline has since pled guilty to two counts of criminal vehicular homicide for also managing to drive her pick up truck head on in to another vehicle that night – causing the death of two people. This story contains a controversy within a controversy. The initial controversy is the obvious: Kishline is the founder of a MM – a national non-disease model of addiction that offers a solution of controlled drinking - and has publicly displayed her failure to control her own alcohol use. The second controversy is between MM and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). Earlier this Kishline officially left MM and returned to AA, also changing her alcohol use goal from one of moderation to one of abstinence. That means that Kishline was attempting to abstain from alcohol use at the time of the accident, and was not practicing moderation. For more details on Kishline, MM, or the accident check any of the below referenced web sites or articles written in The Seattle Times. EASEPRESS would like to avoid the sensationalism behind the tragedy itself. It is our goal to illuminate thoughts about addiction change and to that end we have compiled a capsulation of views on Kishline’s misbehavior.
Commentary: Debriel For numeric minorities, it is imperative to set aside trivial differences and focus on the big picture. Bickering within your minority group benefits the majority. There is no other benefactor. Clearly, in the disease vs. non-disease addiction movements – non-disease theorists are the numeric minority. Upon the latest "controversy" within the field of addictions, leaders of the numeric minority continue to bicker amongst themselves and overlook the consensus of work that needs to be done to create addiction social change. I hope they give EASEPRESS the time of day. Grassroots organizations like ours need their attention and support. And, we are really good people with a lot of intelligent things to say. LISTEN UP! Causing or contributing to friction within the addiction social change movement is detrimental to the very people we say we want to help – the harmfully addicted. To this, I offer: Can’t we all just get along?
|